Guide · 7 min read

Capital Budgeting: NPV, IRR and Payback

Capital budgeting decides which long-term investments are worth making. Four methods appear in nearly every course. Know how to calculate each, what each tells you and why NPV is usually the one to trust.

What capital budgeting is and the four methods

A capital budgeting decision commits money now in return for cash flows over several years: a new machine, a store, a software system. The question is whether the future cash flows justify the cost. Because the cash flows arrive at different times, you need time value of money (see our guide on time value of money) to compare them.

MethodWhat it measuresDecision ruleMain weakness
Net present value (NPV)Value added in today's dollarsAccept if NPV is above zeroNeeds a discount rate; gives a dollar figure, not a rate
Internal rate of return (IRR)The project's own annual returnAccept if IRR is above the required returnCan mislead with unusual cash flows or when ranking projects
Payback periodYears to recover the investmentAccept if shorter than a cutoffIgnores timing within the period and cash flows after payback
Discounted paybackYears to recover the investment in present-value termsAccept if shorter than a cutoffStill ignores later cash flows
Profitability indexPresent value per dollar investedAccept if above 1.0Can mislead when projects differ in scale

A worked project

A company can invest $100,000 in new equipment. It expects cash inflows of $30,000, $35,000, $40,000 and $45,000 over the next four years. The required return is 10 percent. All figures are hypothetical.

YearCash flowDiscount factor at 10 percentPresent valueCumulative cash flowCumulative present value
0-100,0001.0000-100,000.00-100,000-100,000.00
130,0000.909127,272.73-70,000-72,727.27
235,0000.826428,925.62-35,000-43,801.65
340,0000.751330,052.595,000-13,749.06
445,0000.683030,735.6050,00016,986.54

NPV is the sum of the present values including the initial outlay: 27,272.73 + 28,925.62 + 30,052.59 + 30,735.60 - 100,000 = $16,986.54. It is positive, so the project adds value at a 10 percent required return.

Profitability index is 116,986.54 divided by 100,000, which is 1.17. It earns $1.17 of present value for every $1 invested.

Payback: cumulative cash flow turns positive during year 3. After two years, 65,000 has been recovered, leaving 35,000 to recover from year 3's 40,000. Payback is 2 + 35/40 = 2.88 years.

Discounted payback: cumulative present value turns positive during year 4. After three years, 86,250.94 is recovered, leaving 13,749.06 from year 4's 30,735.60. Discounted payback is 3 + 13,749.06/30,735.60 = 3.45 years.

Internal rate of return

The IRR is the discount rate that makes NPV exactly zero. You cannot solve for it with a simple formula when there are several cash flows, so use a financial calculator, Excel or trial and error. For the project above, test two rates.

Discount rateNPV
10.0 percent+16,986
17.0 percent+198
17.2 percent-223

NPV crosses zero between 17.0 and 17.2 percent, so the IRR is about 17.1 percent. Because it is above the 10 percent required return, the project is acceptable on the IRR rule too. In Excel, enter the cash flows in cells (for example B1 to B5 with the initial outlay as a negative) and use =IRR(B1:B5).

The relationship between the two measures is simple. NPV falls as the discount rate rises, and the IRR is the point where it reaches zero. At any discount rate below the IRR, NPV is positive.

When NPV and IRR disagree

For a single, conventional project (money out first, then money in), NPV and IRR give the same accept or reject answer. They can disagree when you must choose between mutually exclusive projects, especially if they differ in scale or timing.

Scale conflict (hypothetical)

At a 10 percent required return, you can do only one of two projects, each with a single cash inflow after one year.

ProjectInvestmentInflow in year 1IRRNPV at 10 percent
X100,000120,00020 percent9,091
Y1,000,0001,150,00015 percent45,455

IRR prefers X because the percentage return is higher. NPV prefers Y because it creates more value in dollars. When projects are mutually exclusive and capital is not scarce, choose the higher NPV, since it measures how much wealth the decision adds.

Other problems with IRR: projects with alternating signs can have more than one IRR, and the method assumes cash flows are reinvested at the IRR itself, which is often unrealistic. A modified IRR (MIRR) fixes the reinvestment assumption by using a stated reinvestment rate. This is a good point to mention in an evaluation.

Working on this assignment now? Get a price for help with your paper.

Get an instant quote

Estimating the cash flows

The calculation is mechanical. The harder skill, and often the bigger source of marks, is deciding which cash flows to include. Follow these principles.

Include or excludePrincipleExample
IncludeOnly incremental cash flows, the change caused by the projectExtra revenue minus extra costs
IncludeCash flows after taxTax on additional profit
IncludeWorking capital changesExtra stock and receivables, recovered at the end
IncludeOpportunity costsRent forgone by using a building the firm already owns
IncludeSalvage value at the endSale of equipment after year 4
ExcludeSunk costsA feasibility study already paid for
ExcludeFinancing costs in the cash flowsInterest is reflected in the discount rate
Include as a tax effectDepreciation is not cash, but it reduces taxDepreciation tax shield = depreciation x tax rate

Depreciation tax shield

Equipment costing $100,000 is depreciated on a straight-line basis over four years, $25,000 a year. At a 25 percent tax rate, depreciation saves 25,000 x 0.25 = $6,250 in tax each year. That saving is a real cash benefit and belongs in the project's cash flows, even though depreciation itself is not a cash payment.

Practice problem with solution

A project costs $50,000 and returns $20,000 at the end of each of three years. The required return is 12 percent. Calculate NPV, IRR, payback, discounted payback and the profitability index, and make a decision.

Solution

  • NPV: the inflows are an annuity. PV = 20,000 x [1 - 1.12^-3] / 0.12 = 20,000 x 2.4018 = 48,036.62. NPV = 48,036.62 - 50,000 = -$1,963.38.
  • Profitability index: 48,036.62 / 50,000 = 0.96, which is below 1.
  • IRR: we need an annuity factor of 50,000 / 20,000 = 2.5. At 9 percent the three-year factor is 2.5313 and at 10 percent it is 2.4869, so the IRR is about 9.7 percent, below the 12 percent required.
  • Payback: 50,000 / 20,000 = 2.5 years.
  • Discounted payback: the present value of all three inflows is only 48,036.62, so the investment is not recovered within the project's life.

Decision: reject. NPV is negative, IRR is below the required return and the profitability index is under 1. Payback of 2.5 years looks acceptable alone, which shows why payback should not be the only test.

Risk, sensitivity and the discount rate

The discount rate should reflect the risk of the project, usually the firm's cost of capital adjusted for how risky the project is compared with its normal business. A higher rate makes future cash flows worth less. It is common to test how the decision changes if inputs are wrong.

TechniqueWhat it does
Sensitivity analysisChanges one input at a time, such as sales or the discount rate, and shows the effect on NPV
Scenario analysisCombines inputs into best, expected and worst cases
Break-even analysisFinds the value of an input, such as annual sales, at which NPV is zero
SimulationRuns many random combinations of inputs to see the spread of NPV

For the worked project, a useful sensitivity is the discount rate. NPV is still positive at 15 percent but turns negative at about 17.1 percent, so the project is robust to quite a large increase in the required return. You can also compare it with the cost behavior ideas in our guide to break-even analysis.

Excel pitfalls

Excel's NPV function assumes the first cash flow occurs at the end of period 1, not at time 0. If your initial outlay is at time 0, do not include it in the NPV range. Add it separately.

=NPV(0.10, C2:C5) + C1     where C1 = -100,000 and C2:C5 = the four inflows

Using =NPV(0.10, C1:C5) would wrongly discount the initial outlay by a year. IRR, by contrast, takes the full range including the time 0 cash flow. Set up a clear inputs area for the rate and cash flows so that you can change assumptions quickly, and label every row.

  • Use incremental, after-tax cash flows Ignore sunk costs and financing costs; include working capital and salvage.
  • Show the discount factor or formula Marks are for the method as well as the answer.
  • State the decision rule and the decision For example, accept because NPV is positive at 10 percent.
  • Compare methods Say why NPV is preferred, and mention payback as a liquidity measure.
  • Discuss risk Include at least one sensitivity or scenario comment.

For help with an investment appraisal assignment, you can get a quote for finance assignment help.

Quick answers

Which method is best?

NPV, because it measures value added in dollars and uses all cash flows with the correct discount rate. IRR and payback are useful extras, and payback also shows how quickly money is recovered.

Why is the initial investment negative in NPV?

It is a cash outflow at time 0. Every cash flow carries its sign, so outflows are negative and inflows positive.

What if the project has uneven cash flows?

NPV and IRR handle them directly. For payback, accumulate the cash flows year by year and interpolate within the year where the total turns positive.

Do I include interest in the cash flows?

No. Financing costs are captured in the discount rate. Including interest in the cash flows would count the cost of funds twice.

Need a hand with your paper?

Tell us the assignment and see your price straight away.

Get an instant quote